Cyber-financial knowledge graph

Translate cyber threat into business impact.

Security platforms see alerts. Business leaders see financial exposure. A cybersecurity ontology connects both views—linking threats and controls to systems, data products, trades, portfolios, obligations and client outcomes.

A new risk language

Security risk becomes actionable when it knows the business.

A compromised market-data gateway is not just a technical asset. It feeds pricing, signals, portfolio decisions and regulatory reports. Our connected ontology makes those dependencies explicit.

Reasoning can then trace an observed indicator through affected infrastructure, exposed data products, financial positions, required controls and reporting obligations.

Interactive impact path

Threat → Control → Financial Consequence

Select a scenario to illuminate its ontology path.

Observed01

Ransomware activity

Security event matches an adversary technique and observable pattern.

Affects02

Trading data platform

Ontology resolves infrastructure, applications, data and owners.

Protected by03

Immutable recovery

Required and implemented defensive techniques are compared.

Exposes04

Pricing & execution

Dependency graph identifies impacted capabilities and portfolios.

Triggers05

Resilience obligation

Policies, materiality thresholds, evidence and reporting are linked.

Reasoned findingPricing and execution services depend on the affected platform; recovery and continuity controls require validation.
Standards-aligned design

One semantic control plane.
Multiple trusted vocabularies.

We align relevant standards without forcing your organization into a single vendor model.

FIBO

Financial business meaning

Entities, instruments, agreements, funds, markets and financial relationships.

STIX 2.1

Threat intelligence exchange

Indicators, threats, malware, vulnerabilities, relationships and observed data.

ATT&CK

Adversary behavior

Real-world tactics and techniques for threat modeling and detection context.

D3FEND

Defensive techniques

Knowledge-graph-based countermeasures connected to digital artifacts.

NIST CSF

Risk and governance outcomes

Govern, identify, protect, detect, respond and recover across the enterprise.

PROV-O

Evidence and provenance

Trace what was observed, generated, transformed, asserted and approved.

Cybersecurity ontology modules

Model the full path from identity to impact.

01Cyber Asset

System, application, endpoint, service, dataset, model, API

02Identity & Access

Person, service account, credential, role, privilege, policy

03Threat

Actor, campaign, malware, technique, indicator, vulnerability

04Control

Preventive, detective, corrective, recovery, control test

05Incident

Alert, observation, incident, investigation, response, evidence

06Business Impact

Capability, process, client, revenue, position, obligation

07Resilience

Dependency, tolerance, scenario, recovery, continuity

08Governance

Policy, risk, owner, exception, assessment, audit finding

Why it changes financial risk

See what is threatened—before the business feels it.

Connect the security operations center to enterprise architecture, data governance, operational resilience and financial risk.

Design a cyber-financial ontology ↗
Tracethreats to material business services
Prioritizecontrols by financial impact
Explainrisk using visible evidence paths
Automatepolicy and obligation reasoning
Coordinatesecurity, data, risk and compliance teams