This public proof center currently presents transparent reference implementation patterns. It does not invent client identities, testimonials, volumes or performance results. Approved client evidence can be published through the author workspace.
Situation: conflicting identifiers across market feeds and internal systems.
Delivery pattern: identity ontology, mapping rules, provenance and SHACL constraints, activated through a queryable graph.
Evidence: traceable identifier resolution, unresolved-case report and reviewed competency questions.
Situation: analysts need answers across filings, events and portfolio context.
Delivery pattern: event and evidence ontology, entity linking, GraphRAG retrieval policy and citation path.
Evidence: question set, source coverage, retrieval trace and human evaluation protocol.
Situation: security events are disconnected from financial services and obligations.
Delivery pattern: technology dependencies, threat concepts, controls and business impacts connected across ontologies.
Evidence: explainable impact paths, control gaps and reviewed scenario outcomes.
SDS recommends five editorial states for future case studies.
| State | Who can use it | Public? |
|---|---|---|
| Draft | Author documents scope and measurement | No |
| Internal review | Technical and claim validation | No |
| Client approval pending | Identity, quote and result authorization | No |
| Approved for publication | Final editorial and legal check | No |
| Published | Approved factual narrative only | Yes |
We link the business question, ontology scope and validation method from the beginning.